January 6 and the Future

The insurrection of January 6 was so chaotic and nihilistic that it may seem unplanned, but that is doubtful. For example, whoever planted the pipe bombs intended to create a diversion, and that’s part of a plan. It’s also likely someone with military training came up with that idea.

So, what was the overall plan?

In general terms, the plan was to decertify the Electoral College vote, or to delay certification indefinitely.

There are some specific parts of the plan that are clear from news reports. For example, that Pence was supposed to unilaterally reject the electoral votes from the states, and that Trump was going to seize the Dominion voting machines and appoint a commission to investigate electoral fraud, headed by Sidney Powell.

https://www.wsls.com/news/politics/2021/01/05/loyal-soldier-pence-torn-between-trump-constitution/

https://abc7.com/donald-trump-sidney-powell-special-counsel-election-results-2020/8922766/

The last link alludes to another apparent part of the plan: the declaration of martial law, or some other state of emergency. And that plays off the QAnon idea of “The Storm,” when martial law is declared and Trump’s enemies are executed.

Given these three elements—-Pence’s rejection of the electoral votes from the states, the seizure of the voting machines and the declaration of a state of emergency—what might the overall plan have looked like? Granted, this is speculative, but there can’t be any doubt about the objective, which was to decertify the election or delay the certification vote indefinitely.

The plan was almost certainly not: “let’s get our supporters to storm the Capitol, scare Congress and then maybe they’ll be so intimidated they won’t certify the election.” Besides being feckless and unrealistic, that plan wouldn’t require seizing the voting machines or a declaration of  martial law.

What we saw on TV was a broken plan; it failed, and in the aftermath Trump’s supporters wandered around the Capitol imagining they’d won a great victory.

Let’s look at what I believe was the original plan, and then look at the modified plan that was put into execution.

The original: Trump speaks to the crowd and it marches to the Capitol. Inside, Congress is in session, presided over by Mike Pence, and the electoral votes from the states are brought to Pence’s podium. Pence looks briefly at the votes and says he cannot accept them, due to fraud. He cites “new” information, perhaps related to the seizure of voting machines—“examination shows conclusive evidence of hacking,” or something like that. Naturally, there’s a scene. At that moment, the Proud Boys, QAnon cultists and various militias storm the Capitol.

This is “The Storm” of QAnon mythology, when Trump’s opponents are executed, and QAnon zealots were quoted to that effect. Congressional leaders were to be arrested and executed—perhaps after some sort of trial.

Trump goes on TV, blames antifa or BLM infiltrators for the killings, invokes the Insurrection Act and declares martial law. For this to be at all plausible, the victims would have to include some Republicans. Since Trump hates Mitt Romney and Liz Cheney more than he hates most Democrats, that part of the plan works for him.

Trump also appoints a commission to investigate electoral fraud, headed by Sidney Powell or Giuliani, seizes all the voting machines and suspends habeas corpus. China is blamed for masterminding everything. A number of people are taken into immediate custody, including the Secretary of State of Georgia. The inauguration is postponed until the commission has completed its work. Congress is suspended for its own safety.

Demonstrations are declared illegal, and any that occur are treated as insurrections, and suppressed by gunfire. Regular army units would do the dirty work, and Flynn might be appointed head of the Joint Chiefs.

Eventually Powell issues a report saying there was massive fraud and overwhelming evidence that Trump won the election. The courts are silenced somehow, and the media suppressed. Trump gets a second term, and enough Republicans are allowed to return to Congress to approve of that.

The modified plan: Pence had refused his part in this play, but the rest of it was intended to go forward without him—or rather, he was added to the list of people to be executed.

This modified plan didn’t work because the Capitol Police fought too hard and no member of Congress was captured and executed. Without executions there was no way to justify the Insurrection Act, suspend habeas corpus and all the rest.  Congress was hopping mad and returned later that night to certify the election, although many Republicans still voted against it.

Of course there’s a lot of supposition here, but this argument is anchored in three places: Trump incited the storming of the Capitol; Trump wanted Pence to reject the Electoral College ballots; Trump’s goal was a second term, if not dictatorship for life.

He couldn’t achieve his goal if Congress were still in session and the courts were operating normally. Therefore he had to declare a state of emergency—martial law or an invocation of the Insurrection Act—so he could dismiss Congress and overrule the courts.

Would this plan have worked? Probably not—I don’t see the Army allowing itself to be used in that way, and the media and courts might not have been neutralized so easily. But it *might* have worked for a few weeks or months.

And more to the point, Trump and Flynn and Powell probably believed it would work.

Would they really have killed members of Congress? Would they really have gone that far? Their objective was to overturn a free and fair election and impose a dictatorship; there’s no way to do that without force. They were certainly aware of the significance of the “The Storm,” to their QAnon followers.

If they didn’t realize they were going to have to kill to destroy American democracy, then they’re even bigger fools than we thought. And in fact Trump and Flynn seemed comfortable with shedding American blood.

Let’s now look at the implications. First, if the modified plan had worked, there would have been significant resistance: mass demonstrations, strikes and so on. After all, the majority of the American people, the judiciary, the media, and most of the political class knew the election was free and fair. Dealing with this resistance would have necessarily involved lethal force, since both the courts and the people would have opposed Trump. The country would have been plunged into civil strife, perhaps full-scale civil war, willy-nilly. It’s impossible to predict how bad the violence would have been, except to note that 45%-50% of Americans have consistently said they were strongly opposed to Trump as President—imagine how they’d react if he were promoted to dictator.

Second, let’s look at what this means for Billionaire Capitalism and American democracy. There is a persistent tendency for the Republican Party to move right on issues, regardless of public opinion or the facts. Originally, back in the ‘80s, Republicans claimed that there wasn’t enough evidence of global warming; then they admitted to the warming, but contended it was just normal cycling of the earth’s climate; then they claimed it was a hoax by scientists, then a plot by liberals to take control of the economy and society.

At present they just spit on the ground whenever the subject comes up. Most of them know that climate change is real, but they have no other cards to play. So they just ramp up the hate against Democrats and ignore the issue.

And this phenomenon isn’t limited to climate change. On tax policy, for example, they started out in the ‘80s arguing that the 70% maximum rate was too high, and a tax cut—a single one— would help the middle class and stimulate the economy; they actually had reasons.

Now the big tax cuts are never-ending and targeted at only a tiny proportion of the population, and the Republicans can hardly be bothered to come up with reasons. It’s transparent that the Republican donor class is using the federal budget as an ATM.

In effect, the Republican position is that the ultra-rich should pay only token taxes, or none at all. And that any opposition to that idea is Marxism. This is not at all where they started out in 1981.

And gun control is similar. It seems centuries ago that George H.W. Bush banned the import of assault weapons.

And democratic rule is another such issue. An awakened democracy has always been the biggest threat to Billionaire Capitalism, and the Republicans have been undermining democracy with gerrymandering, voter suppression and massive disinformation for a long, long time. But at the end of the day, it all looked somewhat constitutional, and stealing an election that wasn’t close was considered bad form.

Storming Congress to prevent counting the electoral vote was quite a break with tradition, to say the least. And summary executions of members of Congress and the Vice-President would likewise have been unprecedented. Once again Republicans have moved much further right, this time on the issues of democracy, the Constitution, and the rule of law.

In fact, they are now openly totalitarian, with no commitment to the democratic process or the rule of law, bristling with rage against America. Their movement is addicted to disinformation, especially conspiracy theories, and its great issue is that the 2020 election was stolen from them. This is a lie, of course, but the truth—any truth—would be wildly out of place.

Can they pivot away from this issue? It’s hard to imagine how; if their hard-core followers truly believe the election was stolen, how can any other issue take center stage? It is possible that many of them realize that Biden won the election fair and square, just as many of them now realize that climate change is real. But that doesn’t mean they’ll let go of the issue, because they are now too alienated and radicalized to admit they were wrong.

Before Jan. 6, there was always a distinction between right-wing domestic terrorists and Republican leadership, but now we have members of Congress attempting to bring firearms onto the House floor, and of course there is Josh Hawley’s fist, raised in solidarity with white supremacists and QAnon cultists on their way to pillage the Capitol.

But as Ed Rollins recently pointed out, “if the GOP becomes the party of chaos, we’re finished.” Can they sell suburban voters t-shirts with the QAnon Shaman’s face on them? Are white middle-class women impressed? Conservative-leaning blacks? Older white voters in swing states? Are old people into QAnon?

Most of the electorate reject more tax cuts or deregulation, and ditto for slashing Social Security, Medicare and Obamacare. Trump’s trade wars were never popular, so what else do Republicans have to offer voters?

What they have is this: that modern American culture itself is the enemy, and no counter-measures taken against it are too extreme. Our modern culture as it exists today—with its recycling bins, its tolerance for gays, respect for science and horror at police violence—is the serpent which the right-wing must smite.

They are trying to sell the idea that America is at war with itself—perhaps only a cultural war for now, but soon enough a shooting war as well—and that conservative whites should sign up enthusiastically for this struggle. The Democratic Party is the political expression of modern American culture, and its triumph would be so intensely oppressive that actively preventing tens of millions of Democrats from voting is justified, besides—in effect—installing Trump as dictator-for-life.

How in the world does that appeal to any group beyond die-hard Trump supporters? How is that any sort of positive vision for the future? Even many Trump supporters might quail at the breadth of this struggle—they know that modern American culture is what it is, that this is what most young people have already chosen, and it’s not going away. Trump supporters generally understand that they’ve lost the culture war—oh, they can blame it on the media and the universities, but they know the situation.

Trying to defeat “peace, love and understanding” with QAnon and white supremacy is not going to work.

And a particular problem for Republicans is violence. QAnon and the white supremacists have a vision that their version of justice can only be achieved by deadly force. And they don’t see this as a disagreeable necessity because they believe bloodshed will purify our corrupt society. And these groups are key, because they are the only Trump supporters who have deeply held reasons for hating modern American culture.

If they start a campaign of assassinations and bombings then what will Kevin McCarthy say? That the GOP needs to stay on message? That Biden’s proposals are communism?

No, if the Republicans resort to domestic terrorism then the country will turn decisively against them.

But if they don’t resort to violence then that undermines the credibility of their message of the monstrous threat of modern American culture and the Democratic Party. If it’s all that bad you’re going to do something about it, right? Oh, you’re just going to sit there, watch OAN and refuse to get vaccinated? I see.

If this is the end of civilization and Republicans are mumbling about voting machines and transexuals, then that looks rather weak, doesn’t it?

Worse, it looks suspiciously like a failed political movement. The Billionaire Capitalist apparatchiks can’t expand their coalition without better issues, so all they can do is try to flog more outrage and violence out of white conservatives who didn’t go to college, but there’s a limit to everything.

The insurrectionists of January 6 have been extremely quiet lately. Whatever they’re thinking, I’m going to guess it’s not good for the Republican apparatchiks; the QAnon cultists and white supremacists were promised that Trump was going to be president by now. They were also promised pardons.

Part of Trump’s appeal to his base was his unvarnished will-to-power; he talked tough and acted large. But after all the trash he talked during the campaign, Biden is unquestionably in the White House.

Eventually, that’s going to sink in for Trump’s base. They may still stick with him, and the “stolen election” issue may have some legs left, but the idea that future elections will just be a replay of 2020 assumes that Trump’s base is unvarying, and it isn’t.

What it is instead are older white people mostly without a lot of education and often (not always) without much money, spare time or energy. These people need to get to bed early and take their meds on time. If they have jobs, they need them.

And they’ve experienced their share of disappointment; they know what that’s like. The 2022 midterms might be a replay of 2020, but I wonder—I just wonder.

Free and Fair Elections, Billionaire Style

If there’s one thing this election proved, it’s that Billionaire Capitalism and the Republican Party are determined to eliminate free and fair elections.

There was systemic voter suppression across the board. For example, although Florida voters overwhelmingly approved a measure to restore voting rights to felons in 2018, the legislature effectively prevented many ex-offenders from voting by requiring in 2019 they pay all court-related fees, affecting possibly 775,000 voters, which is over twice the 370,000 vote margin of Trump’s victory in Florida.

But in addition to merely suppressing the vote, the Republican state government apparently played an even more insidious game, by not providing local election officials the names of ineligible felons so they could be purged from the voter rolls—-until after voting had already begun.

This was a sophisticated multi-tiered voter suppression strategy. By requiring felons to pay all their court-related fees, Florida Republicans imposed a twenty-first century poll tax, and then they failed to enforce that requirement until some people had already voted. Most felons, hearing of the requirement, probably either paid their fees or gave up on voting—but some may have registered to vote after the referendum in 2018 and before the Legislature effectively barred them in 2019 from voting.

By by failing to purge felons from the rolls until voting began in 2020, the state of Florida created a “poison pill” which could have been the basis for a legal challenge in case Biden carried the state.

This could have resulted in a do-over election. You might argue that this was all coincidental, but the delay in purging ex-offenders who hadn’t paid court fees until voting began is telling.

https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2020/10/15/florida-acts-to-remove-felons-from-voter-rolls-as-election-looms-1325582

Another example of voter suppression is the coordinated efforts of the USPS to slow down the mail while the Pennsylvania legislature set a deadline for the arrival of mailed ballots that would have resulted in perhaps tens of thousands of ballots being disqualified. When the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the deadline for receiving ballots three days to compensate for the slowdown in USPS deliveries, its decision was roundly condemned by Justice Alito, who acted as if deliberately slowing down the mail to rig an election was exactly what Madison and Washington had in mind. (See Legitimacy, Federalism and the Election).

I was personally affected by the USPS slowdown. I live in a state where voting by mail is the norm; everyone gets a mailed ballot. if you want to fill out your ballot at the county courthouse on Election Day, there’s a room set aside for that. But most people receive and return their ballot by mail.

This year, my ballot was mailed on October 9, from a county courthouse 18 miles from my home. (I was able to track it online.) On October 23, I still hadn’t received it; I requested a new ballot and picked it up at the county courthouse the same day. I filled it out and dropped my ballot off at a county office on October 24, a Saturday. Online, I tracked its progress; it was received on October 26 and accepted on the 28th.

On October 30 I received my original ballot. It had taken three weeks to travel eighteen miles. I ripped it up and threw it away. This is why federal judges required postal inspectors across the country to sweep sorting facilities for “lost” ballots. There is no knowing how effective Louis DeJoy’s efforts at voter suppression were. In an election with record-breaking turnout, a million or two lost ballots might not be noticed. Did this provide Trump with the margin of victory in North Carolina, for example?

Could ballots lost by the USPS account for part of the polling error we saw in the election?

But let’s pivot and look beyond direct voter suppression. On November 11 there was an extraordinary event in Georgia:

Republican Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue of Georgia called on the state’s GOP secretary of state to resign on Monday, citing “failures” in the election process but not providing any specific evidence to support their claims.

“There have been too many failures in Georgia elections this year and the most recent election has shined a national light on the problems,” Loeffler and Perdue said in a joint statement. “The Secretary of State has failed to deliver honest and transparent elections. He has failed the people of Georgia, and he should step down immediately.”

The Georgia Republicans will both face runoff elections on Jan. 5. Loeffler, who beat back an intra-party challenge from Rep. Doug Collins, will go up against Rev. Raphael Warnock, while Perdue will go up against Jon Ossoff.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/09/loeffler-perdue-georgia-secretary-state-resign-435484

The key accusation the senators make against Raffensperger is that he “failed to deliver honest…elections,” which is extremely harsh—there’s nothing worse you could say about a Secretary of State. In his defense, however, he oversaw an election delivered Georgia to Joe Biden, even though he personally favored Trump; this is not the act of a dishonest man.

But when Perdue and Loeffler use the word “dishonest” they mean that Raffensperger failed to suppress the Democratic vote enough to allow them to avoid the inconvenience of a runoff.

What do they expect to accomplish by demanding that Raffensperger resign? Of course, they might have thought he would actually resign and be replaced by a Republican who do a more “honest” job of suppressing the Democratic vote by reducing the number of voting machines, disqualifying as many ballots as possible from Democratic-leaning precincts, deleting registered Democrats from the voting rolls—the usual bag of tricks.

Or they may have thought they could intimidate him into being more “honest” in the runoff elections.

Either way, their demands feed into the Trump Victimization Narrative that the election was stolen from Trump and the Republican Party. In terms of court challenges, this narrative is doing poorly, because there is no evidence of “illegal” votes being cast—or at least any more often than two-headed calves are born. And demonizing the Democrats isn’t working that well, because the Democrats always push back with good legal arguments and investigative journalism. And online misinformation campaigns are triggering significant pushback from social media companies, especially Twitter; it seems Putin ruined it for everyone.

But scapegoating a lower-ranking Republican official for their own lack of appeal at the ballot box? That might work since it doesn’t involve a judge asking for evidence or fighting Democrats.

But no. Raffensperger has shown some fight himself:

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger responded in a statement Monday saying he would not resign, and defended his office’s handling of the election. He said the election was a “resounding success” from an administration perspective. He highlighted his office’s briefings and updates to argue that they had conducted the process with transparency.

“I know emotions are running high. Politics are involved in everything right now,” Raffensperger said. “If I was Senator Perdue, I’d be irritated I was in a runoff. And both Senators and I are all unhappy with the potential outcome for our President. But I am the duly elected Secretary of State. One of my duties involves helping to run elections for all Georgia voters. I have taken that oath, and I will execute that duty and follow Georgia law.”

Raffensperger said the process for reporting results in the state was orderly and followed the law. And he added that while he was “sure” there were illegal votes cast, it was “unlikely” that their total rose to the “numbers or margin necessary to change the outcome” of the election.

He also took a shot at Perdue and Loeffler for their criticism: “As a Republican, I am concerned about Republicans keeping the U.S. Senate. I recommend that Senators Loeffler and Perdue start focusing on that.”

Looking beyond Georgia, the extraordinary efforts made to intimidate, bribe, or unduly influence election officials and legislators in Michigan—especially in Wayne County—were without precedent.

But the effort to corrupt our elections goes beyond massive voter suppression and intimidation—even including the failed attempt to intimidate the Secretary of State of Georgia. Some of the corruption is systemic.

For example, campaign finance reform was gutted in Citizens United by five Republican judges, including the same Chief Justice Roberts who often claims there are no partisan judges. This not only allowed billionaires to self-fund their own campaigns, it also opened the door for dark money, where the sources of campaign funding are entirely secret. We have no idea whether the Russian Mafia or the Chinese PLA or the Saudis are contributing to our elections—-and shaping the issues that dominate our national dialogue.

The destruction of the Voting Rights Act by the Supreme Court falls into the same category, providing Southern racists the opportunity to intimidate rural black voters, a tactic that is part of Nixon’s Southern Strategy.

And of course there’s the Electoral College, which should have been amended out of the Constitution long ago. But the rise of Billionaire Capitalism means is that it’s virtually impossible to amend the Constitution anymore.

But the biggest single factor in the corruption of American elections is disinformation; if people are intensely propagandized into believing falsehoods, their votes cannot be considered free. If you tell people a thousand times that cyanide is food and salad is poison, and then ask them to order lunch, a significant number of them will end up dead on the restaurant floor, human suggestibility being what it is.

What falsehoods are we talking about? The falsehood that climate change is a hoax, that Biden is suffering from dementia, that the pandemic will disappear “by magic,” that Obama is a Moslem who was born in Kenya, that Obamacare has harmed public health, that Republicans care about white working people, that Russia did not interfere in the 2016 elections, and that cutting taxes for billionaires helps everyone.

This is not an exhaustive list. If we want to go classic, we should note the myths that Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 9/11 attacks and that he had nuclear or biological weapons, that the stock market declined during Obama’s presidency, and that Hilary Clinton should be in prison for an IT mistake.

Of course when looking at Trump’s presidency the disinformation is on a different scale. It’s a falsehood that Biden has profited from his son’s business dealings; it’s a falsehood that American cities are in a state of anarchy. It’s an extreme falsehood that the vote counting was rigged in favor of the Democrats, or that significant numbers of illegal ballots were cast in either 2016 or 2020.

Lying to ordinary Republicans that the election was stolen—potentially getting people to commit acts of terrorism—-is inconceivably destructive.

But the biggest of all these falsehoods is the overall narrative that capitalism is itself a victim. Of what, you might ask? Of the need of our people for healthcare, jobs and education, for clean air and water and a stable climate, for fair elections and a tax system that doesn’t create an oligarchy? Yes, all that.

But capitalism is most particularly victimized by our desire not to be killed by capitalism, to merely survive it—for example by covid-19.

I am writing on December 13, 2020 at 6 am; I just poured a cup of coffee. In twenty minutes the coffee will be too cold for my taste, and by that time about 33 more Americans will have died from covid-19, and most of those deaths will have been avoidable. As my coffee grows cold, the heat drains from the bodies of those 33 Americans, who gasp out their last breath under the exhausted gaze of nurses and doctors.

The falsehood that the suffering capitalism causes is not real.

I could go on, but this is where Billionaire Capitalism has led us. The people would never support the concentration and wealth and power if they understood all the implications, so disinformation on a massive scale has always been a necessity for Billionaire Capitalism.

But when I say “disinformation” that’s an extreme understatement. What the right-wing media has created can only be compared to what Goebbels did by endlessly repeating the Big Lie that a Jewish conspiracy controlled Great Britain, the United States and the USSR, and that this conspiracy was using those countries in an effort to destroy Germany, and so destroying the Jewish population of occupied Europe was a legitimate act of self-defense.

 In other words, Goebbels created an entire world-view and sold it to the German people through endless repetition; Fox News has done something quite similar.

If the comparison to Goebbels seems extreme, let’s take a deep breath and consider—-who undermines free elections and de-legitimizes them at every turn? People who want to end free elections, that’s who. They aren’t doing this out of some mysterious ethical lapse—they’re doing it because that’s the future they want.

In other words, we’re facing a totalitarian movement. As usual with Billionaire Capitalism, what you see is what you get—Republican silence or cooperation with Trump’s efforts to overturn a free election isn’t some melodramatic moral failure of individuals. It is instead perfectly logical, given their political goal of concentrating wealth and power into as few hands as possible; democracy was always an obstacle to achieving that goal. The ideology of Billionaire Capitalism is inherently hostile to democracy and free elections.

This point is “separable,” so to speak, from everything else I’ve written about socialism and capitalism—-that is, even if I’m all wet on everything else, I’m not wrong on this: the Republican Party is committed to destroying free elections in this country. Trump is not an anomaly, and the silence of most other Republicans on this issue isn’t cowardice—it’s agreement.

It’s one thing for Republicans to gerrymander, suppress voter turnout, pack the courts and blanket the nation with disinformation, both Russian and homegrown. But it’s been an open question whether, given their other advantages, they would actually attempt to overturn an election where the vote went decisively against them. They do have to maintain a fig-leaf of legitimacy, and some of them might shrink from such a loathsome deed.

But now we have the answer. The majority of Republican elected officials are willing to throw out any set of votes—whether from Detroit or Atlanta—that go against them, however ridiculous the pretext. If they lose an election by seven million votes, they will try to disenfranchise seven million and one voters. And they will incite violence against anyone who stands in their way, particularly other Republicans.

And at this point, violence is a key issue. Will we end up with a widespread domestic terror movement based on the myth that the election was stolen from Trump? This appears more likely than not, because the goal of billionaire capitalism is to destroy free elections covertly, without obviously doing so. And what could be better that to destroy free elections in the name of preserving them? This would be the apotheosis of billionaire capitalism’s campaign of disinformation, the point where the sun really does rise in the west and set in the east, because billionaires say so.

But an armed uprising—bombings, assassinations, mass shootings—would require several hundred or several thousand participants to be sustainable. A dozen or so domestic terrorists would be hunted down in a matter of days. But will ordinary Republicans be willing to “go McVey” in such numbers? Oh, they love to go online and make anonymous threats, but actual fighting and killing? I doubt many of them will go that far—but the ones that do might cause a lot of damage.

I am assuming of course that the military and police will not attempt to overthrow the Biden administration, which is a safe assumption; no general will risk his career, and no police chief will risk prison.

And if there is a persistent domestic terrorist movement that kills hundreds or thousands of Americans and disrupts American life for a few years, then what? There is a tendency in American politics to recoil from extremism, and that might be decisive.

But Billionaire Capitalism will continue trying to destabilize and discredit democracy. There’s an Iranian folk tale about a turtle and a scorpion trapped in a flood. They find themselves on an island about to disappear in rising waters. The scorpion begs the turtle to save his life, to carry him on his back to safety. The turtle is highly dubious: “you’ll sting me.” But the scorpion pleads desperately, saying “why would I hurt someone who is saving my life?” Finally the turtle agrees—aren’t we all living creatures, after all? They set off, and the scorpion tries repeatedly to sting the turtle in the head, but the turtle always manages to duck away.

They reach safety, and the turtle, outraged, demands an explanation.

And the scorpion says, “it’s just in my nature.”

And it’s the same with Billionaire Capitalism—-it can’t really co-exist with democracy for long, because sooner or later the people will vote to end a system that is clearly harmful to them.

Eventually, the turtle will leave the scorpion behind.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/09/loeffler-perdue-georgia-secretary-state-resign-435484

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/usps-states-delayed-mail-in-ballots/2020/08/14/64bf3c3c-dcc7-11ea-8051-d5f887d73381_story.html

https://www.vox.com/2020-presidential-election/2020/8/16/21370963/usps-postal-service-mail-sorting-machines-trump-meadows-2020-election-ballots

“What in me is dark, Illumine…”

For a moment, let’s calmly look around us. What values do we see reflected in the response to the pandemic? My intention here is not “virtue signaling” or moral judgement. This is a question about where civilization is headed, and what it means to us.

It is quite clear that many states in the US are re-opening too soon:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/study-estimates-24-states-still-have-uncontrolled-coronavirus-spread/2020/05/22/d3032470-9c43-11ea-ac72-3841fcc9b35f_story.html

And this is not a matter of state or local choice, as we see when a major jurisdiction refuses to re-open. Clearly the might of the Department of Justice will be used to compel re-opening:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/22/politics/doj-la-warn-stay-at-home/index.html

There is absolutely no doubt that re-opening this soon will result in needless deaths, and whether it’s 150 deaths or 150,000 doesn’t matter—either to Trump or to us as socialists and citizens. For Trump the exact number is meaningless, because human life is meaningless to him, and to us the needless death of a single individual is enough to reject the entire course of action.

I have written that the basis of socialism is the intuition that human life is sacred. The current capitalist system does not regard human life as sacred, and in fact it sees little practical value in saving American lives—hence the lack of testing and contact tracing.

The immediate plan of billionaire capitalism is to retain its grip on power. This means Trump must be re-elected and the Republicans must hold the Senate. For Trump to be re-elected, the economy must recover somewhat before Election Day. Therefore the stay-at-home orders must be lifted—however many lives it costs—even though the economy was destroyed by the coronavirus, not by the resulting lockdowns.

Republicans have cited the example of Sweden as their model of an economy untroubled by stay-at-home orders. Here’s what’s wrong with that idea:

Coronavirus Deaths and Change in GDP, Northern Europe

Country Deaths from Covid-19

(5-23-20)

Deaths per 100,000 people

(5-23-20)

Projected change in GDP 2020

(IMF)

Sweden 3,992 38.6 -6.8%
Norway 235 4.4 -6.3%
Finland 306 5.5 -6%
Denmark 561 9.6 -6.5%
Germany 8,261 9.9 -6.5%

Sweden’s policies have been a public health disaster without any economic benefit. The contrast with Germany, a much more densely populated country, is particularly notable. It appears that at least 3,000 Swedes have died needlessly in this pandemic—so far.

There are other estimates of Sweden’s economic performance in 2020—in one Riksbank scenario, the Swedish economy will shrink by 9.1% in 2020. I used the IMF estimates to make the comparisons between countries consistent.

For deaths per country:

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

For IMF estimates of 2020 GDP:

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2020/01/weodata/index.aspx

For Riksbank estimates:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/30/coronavirus-sweden-economy-to-contract-as-severely-as-the-rest-of-europe.html

For population numbers:

https://www.wikipedia.org/

So, if Sweden is killing off its citizens at 9 times the rate of its closest neighbor, Norway, and 4 times the rate of Germany and Denmark, for no economic benefit whatsoever, then why do we want to emulate Sweden?

This makes no sense whatsoever unless we recognize Billionaire Capitalism as a political movement of nearly unlimited ruthlessness. Will Americans go back to work? Will they “shop until they drop” — or at least until they have trouble breathing? Will they go on vacations, book a cruise? If they do, that might create enough of an economic bounce to put Trump over the top in November—with lots of help from the Russian trolls and Fox News, of course. Americans might well refuse to go along, but Trump and his advisers figure, what do we have to lose?

 All we have to lose are thousands and thousands of lives. And a brutal second wave that could kill another two hundred thousand or so and wreck the economy for 2021, but that might be after the election, so no worries.

The horror of this situation cannot be emphasized by mere prose. The most powerful political force in our civilization—Billionaire Capitalism—is sacrificing lives on a massive scale to retain power.

When you realize that the system does not care whether you live or die, and it doesn’t care whether anyone you love lives or dies, you become profoundly alienated. You are no longer a citizen—you’re a horse caught in a burning barn. In this crisis, Billionaire Capitalism is no longer able to hide its complete disregard for human life. It’s the burning barn.

When the people absorb this lesson, then the political and social situation will become highly unstable. In truth, it was always unstable, or at least unsustainable, but now we have nothing left. I prefer change that comes through debate and elections, and I also prefer barns not to catch fire with horses inside. But the forces of change have their own laws, and our suffering will continue.

If this system isn’t changed, our suffering over the next decades will be incalculable; but changing this system will also bring suffering. “Why, this is hell, nor am I out of it,” as Marlowe wrote in Doctor Faustus.

Identity politics is irrelevant here. If your life has been written off by the political system, any incidental dehumanization you suffer—whether it’s mansplaining or microaggressions—is hardly worth mentioning. You are possibly going to die to preserve the power and wealth of the powerful and wealthy—is it any wonder you will be mocked by them, as well?

Our part as civilized men and women is to provide a positive vision, an alternative. Our historical position is similar to that of the sages of the Enlightenment, struggling against the darkness.

Let’s take Diderot, who was denied paper and ink during his imprisonment, as our example:

Diderot had been permitted to retain one book that he had in his possession at the time of his arrest, Paradise Lost, which he read during his incarceration. He wrote notes and annotations on the book, using a toothpick as a pen, and ink that he made by scraping slate from the walls and mixing it with wine.[

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Diderot

By the time Diderot was released, the poem was embroidered on every page with his notes. No one has read Paradise Lost the way Diderot read it.

With just a drop of Diderot’s prison ink, we may yet change the world.

Human life is sacred—-let’s start with that.